A
peculiar question indeed! You might think it needs complex physics
and maths involved to be answered. But no it is not so the answer is
quite simple and can be explained by means of simple logic.
Suppose
a genius inventor somehow builds a high tech camera capable of
shooting at some trillion frames per second and sets it up for an
experiment to observe light or supposedly the particles which compose
light, the photons.
So,
he uses a simple torch as the source of light which he intends to
fire up on a screen in front of it and will record the path of light
on his camera expecting to see the photons and their interactions in
slow motion. He also ensures absolute vacuum conditions between the
torch and the screen so that he can get a clear observation of the
photons. Finally he turns the room completely dark and fires his
torch and records this action on the camera.
Now,he
runs towards his camera to watch the less than 1 second footage that
was recorded. He runs the footage at the slowest possible rate that
the camera is capable of. But, he finds nothing. Nothing but the
illuminated screen and the burning torch.
The
reason is quite clear. When the torch is turned on, photons are
emitted and are scattered to all directions and some of them reach
our eye and some of them reach the screen. Our intention is to view
the photons that are moving towards the screen. We know that we are
only able to see things when the photons reach our retina after
bouncing off the thing (actually this is not exactly that happens.
This is just an over simplification). So, to view them, they need to
reach our eye first of all (or the camera lens in this case). Also as
photons are massless they cannot interact with each other. So, one
photon cannot also bounce off another photon to enable us to see it.
Thus,
we only see the objects that light illuminates (in this case- the
screen) or the sources from which it is produced (in this case- the
torch) but not light itself. Simply speaking we cannot observe
something that that is itself required for observation.
No comments:
Post a Comment